Three Arguments Against Determinism

 (I am posting this short article that my brother emailed me, in order to reply to it.  My position is completely opposite of his.  I am just posting this now while I work on getting my response up.)

Three Arguments Against Determinism – by Greg Boyd

March 23rd, 2011

There was an interesting article in the NY Times yesterday by John Tierney entitled “Do You Have Free Will? Yes, It’s The Only Choice“.

The article reviews research that suggests that everybody intuitively believes people are morally responsible only for actions they could have refrained from doing and that when people don’t believe they are free they tend to behave more unethically. Hence, if free will is in fact an illusion, it is an illusion that is hard wired into us and one that is extremely helpful, if not absolutely necessary, for ethical behavior. If you believe in God and yet deny the reality of free will, you have to wonder why the Creator would hard-wire us to be so thoroughly self-deceived. In any event, I thought I’d offer three other pragmatic arguments for free will along the lines covered in this article.

The Incoherence of Ordained Morality. I would argue that the association of moral responsibility and free will is not only deeply intuitive, as the article suggests, it is also logically necessary. That is, I would argue that denying the association of moral responsibility and free will results in incoherence. For example, when a Calvinist asserts something like: “God ordains that Satan does evil in such a way that God remains morally holy for ordaining Satan to do evil while Satan becomes morally evil for doing what the all-holy God ordained him to do,” I submit they are asserting something that is beyond counter-intuitive; it is utterly incoherent. For a concept to have meaning it must have some rooting in our experience, at least by analogy. A concept for which there is no analogy in our experience is a vacuous concept. Yet, after decades of asking, I have yet to find anyone who can provide an analogy by which we might give meaning to the concept of an agent being morally responsible for what God ordained them to do. (I develop this argument at length in response to Paul Helseth in Four Views of Divine Providence).

Determinism is Self-Refuting. If free will is an illusion and everything is predetermined, then the ultimate cause of why a person believes that free will is an illusion and everything is predetermined is that they were predetermined to do so. But it’s hard to see how a belief can be considered “true” or “false” when it is, ultimately, simply a predetermined event. The snow falling outside my window right now is due to the fact that preexisting conditions determined it to be so. But we wouldn’t say that the snowfall is “true” or “false.”

Refuting Determinism By Action. You know what a person truly believes by how they act more than by what they say, for we often think we believe something when in fact we don’t. (E.g. the husband who convinces himself he loves his wife even though he mistreats her, cheats on her, etc.). On this basis I’d like to suggest that everyone who deliberates believes in free will, even if they think they do not, for its impossible to deliberate without acting on the conviction that the decision is up to you to resolve. For example, I am this moment deliberating about what to work on when I finish this blog. Should I work on a peace essay for a book collection that is due at the end of this week or should I finish reading a book by Andrew Sullivan that I started two days ago? As I weigh the pros and cons of both possibilities, I cannot help but manifest my conviction that I genuinely could opt for either one of these alternatives and that it is up to me to decide which I will choose. In other words, I reveal a deep rooted conviction that I am free as I deliberate, and the same holds true for every deliberation anyone engages in. There simply is no other way to deliberate. People may sincerely think they believe in determinism, but they act otherwise, and must act otherwise, every time they deliberate. The great American philosopher Charles Pierce argued that a belief that cannot be consistently acted on cannot be true. If he’s right about this – and I believe he is – then determinism must be false.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Literary.Land.of.Alysia

Write Your Own Story

Minneapolis Criminal Law News

The Defense View from the Courts of Minnesota

Interesting Literature

A Library of Literary Interestingness

pharmacisthelp's Blog

To Help Students and Patients understand Pharmacy in Canada

An Unemployed Pharmacist's Diary

An unsatisfied Pharmacists mindset

Recovering Agnostic

Heckling from the back pew

The Angry Pharmacist

Rants from the most trusted profession.

Medical Minded

My Journey & Advice for Others

READ Research English At Durham

Books and literature articles, news and events, from the UK's top Department of English Studies at Durham University

Wheresmytutor's Blog

Just another WordPress.com weblog

ladyfreudpsych

Freudian theory focused on childhood traumas and upbringing influencing mental health.

Cato @ Liberty

A place for people to discuss ideas, whether intellectual, political, philosophical, historical, literary, theological, cultural or what have you....

Through My Lens

Photographs by Peter Berge

Minneapolis Handyman

Your Source for the Best Minneapolis Handyman Companies in MN

The Cynic Center

My views of the world, the title says it all

Matt on Not-WordPress

Stuff and things.

Annals of Internal Medicine Online First

A place for people to discuss ideas, whether intellectual, political, philosophical, historical, literary, theological, cultural or what have you....

Blogging for a Good Book

A suggestion a day from the Williamsburg Regional Library

Feedly

Helping Knowledge Workers Thrive

Cato @ Liberty

A place for people to discuss ideas, whether intellectual, political, philosophical, historical, literary, theological, cultural or what have you....

Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog

A place for people to discuss ideas, whether intellectual, political, philosophical, historical, literary, theological, cultural or what have you....

The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast

A Philosophy Podcast and Philosophy Blog

Philosophy Bro

A place for people to discuss ideas, whether intellectual, political, philosophical, historical, literary, theological, cultural or what have you....

Neuropsychopharmacology

A place for people to discuss ideas, whether intellectual, political, philosophical, historical, literary, theological, cultural or what have you....

Zombie Politics

A place for people to discuss ideas, whether intellectual, political, philosophical, historical, literary, theological, cultural or what have you....

The Daily Post

The Art and Craft of Blogging

The WordPress.com Blog

The latest news on WordPress.com and the WordPress community.

%d bloggers like this: